|
NTA
NETWORK
Issue
Five,
April 2005
Contents
Our
program chair, James Mackie, and his committee have put together an outstanding
program for the Spring Symposium, with the theme of “Big Ideas Amid Big
Deficits.” Sessions relate to the President’s two major domestic
initiatives–tax reform and social security–as well as compliance, fiscal
pressures, the recently passed corporate tax bill, and tax shelters. You can
find details of the program, as well as the excellent Friday afternoon State Tax
Program focusing on multistate tax agreements arranged by Gary Cornia, on the
NTA web site (http://www.ntanet.org).
Our speaker for Thursday lunch is George Yin, Chief of Staff of the Joint
Committee on Taxation; Charles McLure is the luncheon speaker for the state
session on Friday. PLEASE REGISTER BY MAY 10 (April 21 is the cutoff date for
the for NTA hotel rate). We
were all saddened by the untimely loss of David Bradford. Joel Slemrod, our vice
president, has written a memorial to him, which appears in this newsletter. The
fundamental tax reform session at the Spring Symposium on May 19 is dedicated to
David, who played such an important role in this area, from overseeing the
Treasury blueprints for tax reform study to formulating his own consumption tax
proposal, the X-tax. The
Spring Symposium will also be the occasion of the first presentation of our new
award for outstanding public service, named in honor of Bruce Davie and Al
Davis. The award will be announced at lunch, but will presented at the Thursday
evening cocktail party, which will be in honor of the winner. Please make plans
to join us there. We
are also moving forward to the November 17-19 meetings in sunny Miami, ably
chaired by John Diamond. Matt Murray is planning a new innovation: a session
featuring student authors and discussants. So all of you professors out there:
encourage your students to submit papers or paper ideas for consideration. You
can send them to mmurray1@utk.edu.
Once the papers are chosen, we will send out a call for student discussants. We
also remind you that the deadline for the general call for papers and sessions
for the fall meetings, which is posted in the NTA web site and has been sent by
e-mail, is May 1. We
have kudos (see below) for several of our members: Jim Poterba, Lil Mills,
George Plesko, and Rosanne Altshuler. Please let NTA know is there is a special
achievement or good news that we can share with other members. Following
this message is a special article on a hot topic–social security reform–that
I hope you find interesting and informative.
ANNUAL
SPRING SYMPOSIUM, May 19-20, 2005 98TH
ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON TAXATION, CALL FOR PAPERS
DEADLINE MAY 1, 2005 OUTSTANDING DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS, DEADLINE
JUNE 1, 2005. Application and nomination forms
may be downloaded from www.natnet.org.
For further information, contact the National Tax Association at
202-737-3325 or natltax@aol.com The
$600 Billion Number The key question is not whether but when and
how urgently such adjustments are needed. To answer that, we must focus on the
cost of delaying policy adjustments. Let’s focus on Social Security for the
moment (the argument applies equally to Medicare). That program’s $11.1
trillion imbalance grew by about $600 billion over the previous year due to
interest costs on the outstanding balance. This interest cost, which was
anticipated in the previous year’s report, has garnered a considerable
amount of attention after being popularized by the President in his pitch for
personal accounts. Paul Krugman, in particular, wrote that “anyone who
repeats the $600 billion line is helping to spread a lie.” In its unsigned
op-ed on March 24, the New York Times,
for example, writes, “the difference between this year’s $11 trillion
eye-popper and last year’s number–$600 billion–is being used as evidence
of a scary deterioration in Social Security’s finances. That’s just wrong.
The two monster numbers are actually the same quantity–different ways of
expressing an unchanging level of debt at two different points in time.” To be sure, emphasis on the $600 billion
interest costs must be balanced against the fact the economy is also growing.
If the economy (more specifically, the payroll tax base) does grow at the rate
of interest (or faster), then the government can run a Ponzi game: It can
borrow funds for current spending, and pay them off from larger future tax
revenues without increasing tax rates. As MIT Nobel Laureate Paul Samuelson
once wrote in 1967, “Social Security is squarely based on what has been
called the eighth wonder of the world–compound interest. A growing nation is
the greatest Ponzi game ever contrived.” Of course, if the conditions
required for a Ponzi game actually held then Dr. Krugman and the NYT should
hardly be complaining about the recent (or any) increases in deficits either.
They cannot have it both ways. The condition required for a
government-operated Ponzi game, though, has never held in the United States on
a risk-adjusted basis. The potential for such a Ponzi game is just a
theoretical quirk that every economics graduate student studies but few
economists take seriously. Under normal economic conditions, such a Ponzi game
is not viable because interest costs grow faster than the economy. In other
words, there really is a cost to
delaying action on entitlement reforms. The cost of delay can be properly measured
by asking how much payroll taxes would have to be increased or benefits
reduced immediately and forever to make Social Security and Medicare
financially sustainable–and examining how the size of these adjustment
changes if action is delayed. According to the Trustees’ own calculations,
placing Social Security and Medicare on a sustainable course would require
increasing payroll taxes from their current rate of 15.3 percent of wages to
about 36.1 percent of wages–an increase of about 136 percent. And, for each
5 years that we delay action, the required immediate and permanent payroll tax
hike increases by about 10 percent–or about 1.5 percent of wages–not a
minor increment. But that’s not all: This calculation
unrealistically assumes that people would continue to work just as hard after
a delayed but larger adjustment as if the adjustment were implemented
immediately. The Social Security and Medicare Trustees don’t provide
calculations that account for this “feedback” effect of policy delays on
labor supply. Nor do the Trustees provide the information needed to calculate
the alternative policy of reducing benefits immediately and
forever–although, based on our calculations, we suspect that the number is
more than 50 percent. Regardless
of the merits of personal accounts, there is no question that the cost of
delays in reforming our entitlement programs is substantial. David F. Bradford died on February 22 from
injuries sustained from a fire in his home two weeks earlier. David received his Ph.D. from Stanford in
1966, and for most of his career was at the Woodrow Wilson School at
Princeton; since 1993 he was also an adjunct professor at NYU School of Law.
Although he later became best known for his foundational work on consumption
taxation, David also made important contributions to a wide range of other
topics in public finance. For example, his work with William Baumol in the
late 1960s was one of the important contributions to the emerging theory of
optimal taxation, and his 1981 paper on the effects of a tax on corporate
distributions was very influential in the early days of the development of the
“new” view of dividend taxation. David’s research focus was forever changed
by his first (from 1991 to 1993 he was a member of the CEA) stint in the
federal government, when in 1975-76 he served as Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Tax Policy (Tax Analysis) at the Treasury Department. During this time he
headed up the Treasury inquiry into fundamental tax reform that resulted in
the classic report Blueprints for Basic Tax Reform. This report laid
out detailed prototypes for both a consumption tax and a comprehensive income
tax, and argued that a comprehensive consumption base has advantages over an
income base in terms of both the equity of the ideal form of the base and the
relative ease with which the ideal could be approximated by simple, practical
rules. From that point on much of David’s intellectual effort went toward
addressing theoretical and practical questions regarding consumption taxation,
including how to tax financial services, transition issues and, most recently,
international issues. He came to champion what he called the X-tax, a version
of the Hall-Rabushka flat tax that features graduated tax rates applied to the
personal tax base. While it is accurate to say that David was a
consumption-tax advocate, he was always intellectually rigorous and honest in
assessing the case. His 1986 book Untangling the Income Tax is still well worth reading, as are his
articles collected in Taxes,
Wealth, and Saving. I was asked to write a blurb for the jacket of his
collected works, and what I wrote sums up how I, and many others in our
community, regarded him: “David F. Bradford is the deepest thinker, bar
none, among public finance economists. His writings on consumption taxation
and saving are consistently insightful, important, and elegant.” In addition to being an exemplary scholar,
David was a wonderful human being. I will never forget the encouragement he
gave me when I was a new assistant professor, and the seriousness with which
he took my ideas. Spending time with David was always a joy, and usually was
also an exhilarating intellectual experience during which no undefended
preconceptions were brooked, and from which one seldom emerged without being
enlightened. The public finance community will miss him greatly, as will
I.
Poterba and Altshuler with Federal Tax Reform Panel James Poterba is
member of the President's Advisory Panel on
Federal Tax Reform. He is the Mitsui Professor of Economics and the Associate Head of
the Economics Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is
also the Director of the Public Economics Research Program at the National
Bureau of Economic Research and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences and the Econometric Society. Rosanne
Altshuler is a senior economist on the Panel staff. She is associate professor
of economics at Rutgers and an editor of the National
Tax Journal. Before joining the Tax Panel, she was acting as a special
advisor to the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Mills and Plesko Receive Wildman Medal NTA members Lillian Mills of the University of Arizona and George Plesko of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have been awarded the 2005 Deloitte Wildman Medal from the American Accounting Association for the most significant contribution to the advancement of the practice of accounting. Their research, "Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income," was published in the National Tax Journal in December 2003.
Welcome New Members
Winter/Spring 2005 Sarah
Aadland,
Growth and Justice ,St. Paul MN
Please
send information about your recent promotions, organization changes, etc., to
natltax@aol.com
A Certificate of Excellence was awarded by TIAA-CREF to Amy Finkelstein and James Poterba for their paper “Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets: Policyholder Evidence from the U.K. Annuity Market,” published in the February 2004 issue of the Journal of Political Economy. SPECIALIST
IN PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS (Vacancy #050074) Congressional Research Service (CRS) (CRS) is accepting applications for an
economist to provide objective, nonpartisan analysis and consultation to
Congress. The incumbent will focus on issues related to taxation and the federal
budget. This position requires a degree in economics or an equivalent
combination of education and experience, and is being offered at the GS-15 level
($103,947-$135,136). Duties include preparing expert analytical
studies on public policy issues of national or international significance;
providing consultation and assistance to congressional committees, members, and
staff; and participating in or leading team research projects and seminars. This
is not an accounting or financial market analysis position; candidates with
experience in government budget analysis are encouraged to apply. To
apply online (preferred), visit http://www.loc.gov/crsinfo
or call 202-707-5627 to request an applicant job kit. Please refer to vacancy #050074 in all correspondence. Applications
must be received by April 22, 2005.
CRS is the public policy research arm of the U.S. Congress and is fully
committed to workforce diversity. OFFICERS President Jane G. Gravelle Vice
Presidents Robert Tannenwald Secretary Treasurer Past
Presidents Thomas S. Neubig Gary
C. Cornia ELECTED MEMBERS William H. Allaway, Jr. Leonard E. Burman Stacy Dickert-Conlin Stacey
Johnson Douglas
Lindholm Lillian
Mills Pamela
Moomau James R. Nunns Gary Sasse Daniel
N. Shaviro Eric J. Toder Sally Wallace James Wetzler Paul A. Wilson George Zodrow ADVISORY MEMBERS Harley Duncan Richard
Lavine Lynn Edward Reed Francois Vaillancourt Joan Youngman Rosanne Altshuler (9/04-8/05) Therese J. McGuire J. Fred Giertz NATIONAL
TAX ASSOCIATION 202-737-3325
|
|
©Copyright 2008, National Tax Association. All rights reserved. |